 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Forums - Computer music & technology
Subject: SX
Message 11/51 13-Feb-03 @ 04:03 PM - RE: SX
Message 12/51 13-Feb-03 @ 05:25 PM - RE: SX
the steinberg update path dies...i've looked hi and lo and repeatedly>and am okay where i am for now.
i got too much stuff happening to worry about it.
i'd be interested in the 4.1 if you don't need it, though.
i was thinking i never heard of 4.7.
thanks noah.
Message 13/51 15-Feb-03 @ 11:54 PM Edit: 16-Feb-03 | 01:39 AM - RE: SX
R.A.T.
Posts: 392
Link?: No link
File?: No file
moved from VST to SX 6 months ago.SX is the same as VST to use, just easier. Offline processing, automation etc. If you know VST well it will take you maybe 5 minutes to get to grips with it.
(Got to be carefull there. I hope I havn't copied anything from SOS by 'accident' heh heh).
I havn't used Logic so I'm not gonna make any comparison on quality, horses for courses and all that, but it does look like quite a different approach to Cubase. Quite a big step.
Message 14/51 17-Feb-03 @ 03:48 AM - RE: SX
i hear this term used a lot but haven't any understanding what it means.
Message 15/51 17-Feb-03 @ 04:57 AM - RE: SX
anyway...clay..not offline automation. offline processing. you right click on an event or part and you can process it in place
only problem is not being able to hear it in the mix. they REALLY need to come up with a "process in place" button that applies mixer FX so you can get something sounding how you want it and then bounce it down
Message 16/51 17-Feb-03 @ 09:50 AM - RE: SX
[image file]
influx, all you have to do is select the part that
you want to bounce, hit 'p' and then hit bounce
selection. set up a key command for bounce
that makes sense to you.
i think that sx carries some of the better layout
and functional features of previous versions,
expands upon them and makes them simpler.
plus there are loads of navigational shortcuts
now. the process history is killer. the hitpoints
feature is very cool too.
i'm stoked on sx. runs smoothly with reason.
haven't had any majorproblems except for the
installation. when you upgrade, don't plug in
the dongle and you're set.
Message 17/51 17-Feb-03 @ 12:24 PM - RE: SX
i want to adjust an eq on...i can process with an outside editor without leaving the sequencer?
this sounds cool....the issue here is whether you can monitor it in place as you edit.
this would seem to be a very nice feature.
hey....i'm learning something everyday here!
and horizens...thanks for posting about your positive experience with sx....this is helpful>
Message 18/51 17-Feb-03 @ 06:50 PM - RE: SX
export audio mixdown does...
for bounce you dont need to set the locators either tho. just select the parts, right click and bounce audio selection
clay...you can not monitor when using process in place. Kind of a letdown. but...you CAN just get the mix right and then export audio and create a track with the exported file.
Message 20/51 17-Feb-03 @ 08:25 PM - RE: SX
sonar
logic
bleh. oh well. I still like SX
get your terms straight, son
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
There are 51 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum
