Forums - Computer music & technology
Subject: PC vs. MAC using VST or VST24
Viewing all 4 messages - View by pages of 10: 1
Original Message 1/4 08-Sep-98 @ 09:02 PM - PC vs. MAC using VST or VST24
Message 2/4 09-Sep-98 @ 01:56 PM - RE: PC vs. MAC using VST or VST24
with. It does cost a bit more though, but I'd probably
have a look at the new iMac because it's got a great spec
and is reasonably priced.
Mind you I do work from within an Apple Resellers Office
(but hey the bastards never give me any commission, I'm
not even part of the comp
Message 3/4 09-Sep-98 @ 04:18 PM - RE: PC vs. MAC using VST or VST24
Thanks....
Message 4/4 10-Sep-98 @ 12:39 PM - RE: PC vs. MAC using VST or VST24
RAM (which needs upgrading to 64) and a 2G Hard disc. The
disc capacity is fine, but the CPU can't handle more than
about 3 effects loaded up at once - this is more of an
issue than the number of tracks itself actually.
I would suggest for 16 tracks and loads of fx you would
need a 233Mhz G3 machine (266 if poss) - desktop Macs are
more specced up in terms of cache sizes - I bought my
laptop for portabilitys sake, so traded off a bit of
performance.
Macs have 32bit sound capability built in, but as for
analog in/outs this would require a card - I don't know
much about them. CD burning dunno, midi card not needed,
just a copy of Opcode's OMS (free from their web site) and
an interface which plugs into the modem port - trouble is
it's all changing now iMacs are here - they have USB ports
so quite what kit is available for them yet I couldn't
tell you. Interfaces by opcode or Altech are meant to be
OK.
Hope I've been of some use - I don't know the world about
complex studio setups, my laptop is just for home use, but
I do know alot about Macs if you nee
Viewing all 4 messages - View by pages of 10: 1
There are 4 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum