Forums - Mixing & FX
Subject: engineers... help me!
Viewing all 11 messages - View by pages of 10: 1 2
Original Message 1/11 12-Dec-02 @ 05:38 PM Edit: 12-Dec-02 | 05:40 PM - engineers... help me!
I have 32 tracks of audio, and my first observation is the feeling of crowding between the sounds of the track. Don't get me wrong, they are in the right place but they do not have enough breathing space to really stand out.
Now, I know one of the tricks to giving your sounds their own space, is to shelve the sounds so that only the necessary frequencies remain. While this sounds simple, I know there will be more to it. Any ideas??? Also, all of my sounds have been compressed to fit in their given space, but are there any other alterations to the dynamics of the sounds that I should be applying?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Regards.
Steve.
Message 2/11 12-Dec-02 @ 06:58 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
Well that's probably part of your problem. Compression, imo, should only be used to level out a sound with wildly varying dynamics, or to change the attack of something to give it a "sound." If you rely on compressors to do these tasks for EVERY track, it's gonna be a mess. Basically, I wouldn't use compression to get a track to 'sit right in the mix.' Use EQ and automation for that (let a track be on the quiet side, but still audible... if certain notes get lost, give em a little automation level bump just at that part, but don't just compress the whole thing).
Start with just your rhythm tracks and get them good and clear and THEN start adding all the other elements. You may find some just get in the way of the groove. My old boss was a true asshole, but one great thing I leaned from him is that you have a finite amount of energy in a mix, and every element eats away at that. If something isn't working, don't just lower it so it "doesn't bother me," just get rid of it altogether. A tune's gotta have space between the notes or else it's just gonna be too much to enjoy, you know? Let it breath...
Can't offer much more without listening to the tracks. When I worked with Dexter Simmons, he told me every song wants to be mixed a certain way and if you just listen to the raw tracks honestly, you will know where they all belong. It's really changed how I approach mixing...
psylichon
Message 3/11 12-Dec-02 @ 07:41 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
Message 4/11 12-Dec-02 @ 08:52 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
i'm not really into this 'you gotta dig a little niche for your sound with eq on other sounds' thing.. i like a bit of masking.. but another way to look at it is not to see it as a situation requiring the mechanical 'eq and processing of tracks for mix supremeness' but a bigger picture.. ie. if you've got a part that's obscured (a) it may be for a reason - speaking more musically than dancically - and (b) you can make an obscure sound more perceptible by leading the attention to it in some way.. without changing it.. but see, that's composition i suppose, mor ethan engineering. if these words even mean anythnig to an evolved being.
Message 5/11 12-Dec-02 @ 10:13 PM Edit: 12-Dec-02 | 10:17 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
THANK GOD, I bounce my processed audio to a new file! Pheeeewwww. But where I get lost is how to use the EQ to give the overall track space. The sounds are far from interfering, except where desirable, with eachother, but they don't have much space around them either.
I have read several interviews with producers/engineers who swear by shelving (not cutting) sounds to the point where they still sound as they should but they give more room to the track, making it appear more dynamic and open. One of these interviews was with Pete Martin (Cass & Slide) and his tracks are a testament to space. His tracks are full of really dynamic warping sounds that seem to occupy a massive frequency range, but don't take up much space in the track. I've tried the technique, but just end up slaughtering my sounds.
I am just wondering how this can be achieved with some success? I do keep my tracks full only of sounds that 'work' with the groove to the best of my abilities, which I think are alright. But I still have the issue of space. Perhaps I am missing something obvious.
But, I was already thinking about re-mixing (not a new version of the track, just re-doing the levels etc from scratch) from the drums up. It seems to have your agreement so, I'll get on with that tomorrow and see if I can find what it is that is missing in my technique.
Anyhow thanks for your help guys!
Stee.
Message 6/11 12-Dec-02 @ 10:33 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
my $.02
e
Message 7/11 12-Dec-02 @ 10:38 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
Steve.
Message 8/11 13-Dec-02 @ 01:14 AM - RE: engineers... help me!
e
Message 9/11 13-Dec-02 @ 02:38 AM - RE: engineers... help me!
as a totally useless side note, i had this soft synth mono patch that had a building dc bias.. ie. after 5 or 6 seconds the waveform drifted entirely off the dc 0 line...!!!! since it was my bass it kinda really sucked.. ultimately, the curve this dynamic presented would have been like .001 Hz.. low shelf cured it w/o resorting to a dc correction process.
weird.
Message 10/11 13-Dec-02 @ 02:51 AM - RE: engineers... help me!
since i do more listeningy than dance (stereo not mono) might not be the best thing but might generate further ideas? :p my knee-jerk reaction to having two 'close' sounds is to slap a chorus or such on one and move it 'around' the other. delay, comb filter, subtle dfx, mda stereoiser? (can't say i find it useful, but that sorta thing)
Message 11/11 13-Dec-02 @ 02:17 PM - RE: engineers... help me!
Kick - Lo pass.
Hats, loops and stuff - hi pass.
Bongos, Perc - band pass.
Its much easier to get your sounds right before using any eq. Filters are eq's and should be used first.
Viewing all 11 messages - View by pages of 10: 1 2
There are 11 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum