aaa Those UAD-1 cards - Music techology forums
skin: 1 2 3 4 |  Login | Join Dancetech |

dancetech forums

28-Apr-2024

Info-line:   [synths]    [sampler]    [drumbox]    [effects]    [mixers]     [mics]     [monitors]    [pc-h/ware]    [pc-s/ware]    [plugins]    -    [links]    [tips]

Search forums House rules Live chat Login to access your admin About dancetech forums Forum home Start a new topic

Forums   -   Music techology

Subject: Those UAD-1 cards


Viewing all 24 messages  -  View by pages of 10:  1 2 3


Original Message 1/24             02-May-07  @  03:08 PM   -   Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Well, since i'm getting adsl soon, a pci slot will become available and i was thinking of getting one of those UAD-1 project card. Is it any good ? I use mainly what comes bundled with my VST-5 in terms of reverb and dynamics. will the UAD-1 fare that much better ? I assume that it will free some of my cpu ressources, but will it do so in a significant manner or will this be marginal ? Also, i'm interested in the card because of the Nigel, wich i could use for my guitar endeavors, will this fare good against say, Amplitube 1.1.1?

thanks for any pointers



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 2/24             02-May-07  @  03:14 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Also, does it heat a lot ?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 3/24             02-May-07  @  09:00 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



can u use it with vst5 even would be my question before anything

?

imo you wanna bump up to an older SX version like v2 which is very stable and so much better'n vst5

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 4/24             02-May-07  @  09:35 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



mmm, apparently n, it's not in the list anyway...but

"Host applications that are not listed may work with the UAD, but compatibility cannot be guaranteed."

anyone using it with VST5 succesfully ?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 5/24             03-May-07  @  07:30 AM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



http://reviews.harmony-central.com/reviews/Plug-In/product/Mackie/UAD-1+VST+PC/10/1

quote
Reviewer Background :
I've been playing guitar for 20 years; writing and recording for 12 years. I sing, play guitar, bass, keyboards, and drums a bit. This was the Mackie UAD-1 with the 3.0 version of its plugins. I was using it with Cubase VST/32 version 5.1 release 1 on a Pentium III 800 Mhz machine with 512 MB of RAM running Windows 2000. My interface is an Echo Mona.


I never knew how it works, you get some plugins with the card, and then you can buy some more from mackie? Can you run standard VST 1.0 2.0 etc.. plugins on this?

Judging by the size of the heatsink, power dissipation might not be that high, but you can never know... what kind of CPU are you using ATM?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 6/24             03-May-07  @  12:43 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



I run a P4 2,4Ghz, one of those cube ones. It's a mini-tower, that's why i'm worried.

And yes, it's an upgrade as you go card, but i don't think it runs other plug-ins but UAD



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 7/24             03-May-07  @  03:54 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



my only coincern is, will the uad actualy give you alot of what you want, meaning: will it supply alot of channel eq and a reasonable amount of compressors which is perhaps why you want to use hardware as opposed to native processing? i dont follow this device really but i seem to remember reasing a few posts here and there where people said they were dissapointed it couldnt do more simultaneous emulations... or is that sample-rate dependant? - I just say that cos now i have a liquidmix on trial i'm finding even with the firewire patches for sp2 added etc it doesnt seem very happy running very many emulations when one assumes or hopes at least it can run 32 channels at 44.1... more tests to do on that so i wont say yet what i'm getting from it, but i am testing it deliberatly on lower powered machines cos to my mind thats where the market is... people who want more without asking the cpu to do it (i think that's AS important a selling point perhaps for potential users as is just the quality of the emulations/convolutions)

also, have you guys tried the waves SSL stuff?.. fuck me it's good!!!... i'm messing with it now and doing a page for it on DT... ok thats all you get, SSL emulations, but the eq is superbly flexible and the sound is bloody fantastic, the range of stuff you can do with just the E channel strip in terms of tweaking or adding bloody great pumping etc is quite superb. I'm sold on it! i've had 8 of them running on a crappy low power amd sempron and an amd2000 and ne'r a flicker on the old cpu usage meter, they aint very greedy processor wise it seems. They do add character for sure.

does wonders with house loops! and a gorgeously designed interface, so well laid out - not cheap tho.. makes me wonder about duende ;)

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 8/24             03-May-07  @  04:20 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Yeah, I've tried the Waves SSL pack... dunno, for that money I'd expect a lot more these days...

The channel strip emulation was fine (unfortunately the EQ does some aliasing that just seem wrong :-( ), great GUI, albeit you have to open it twice in Albeton to make it work.

I found the compressor's sound very unique, but I was really pissed about the interface ie. now way to dial in values for attack/release/ratio other than those predefined values... fine, the original was just like that, but come on, this is 2007 and this is all software, I want to be able to finetune those controls.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 9/24             03-May-07  @  07:15 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

psylichon

Posts: 4573

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



The UAD cards excell at modeling vintage EQ's and compressors, and that's why most people buy them. Their plugins sound unique compared to native plugins... even some TDM plugins. Very complex algos result in richer tone... and also extensive DSP use. In fact, the biggest complaint amongst UAD users that I've found is that you need 3 or 4 of them if you want to do any serious mixing. They are old cards, and have pretty limited DSP by today's standards. In fact, I think you can only run like 2 (!) of the newer Neve 1073 plugins before 1 card is maxed out. That's just unnacceptable to me, no matter how fantastic it sounds.

Of course, you can get a lot more of the stock plugins going than that, and they sound pretty good. Way better than VST5.0's stock stuff for sure.

They're not a free ride though. Most people don't realize that instantiating a UAD plug still uses CPU resources for the "wrapper" to whatever system they're using (ultimately the UAD plugs are proprietary and need to be wrapped to make them VST, AU, RTAS, etc.) This hit is most likely simiar in size to the CPU needed to run, say, the stock EQ plug, so....


But again, they will sound much much better!

One last thing to consider... there are loads of compatibility issues on the forums out there. Certain mobos simply WILL NOT run a UAD, and there are deal-breaking software combinations too. Best to do a little more research on a few more [ahem] active boards out there before you make the jump...



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 10/24             03-May-07  @  07:27 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Thanks for that precious info Psy !!

Thing is, i'm more looking for cpu usage relief, so the UAD doesn't seem for me.

any suggestions for a similar pci card ?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 11/24             03-May-07  @  07:43 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



P4 2,4Ghz ??

Shit, that is 600 Mhz more than my Athlon 64... not to say that I can't run out of cpu cycles ... (on the ninja tune there were 10 audio tracks, an albino, a z3ta+, an FM7, some 4-5 filter plugins, voxengo EQs in "high" mode, some reverb, 4-5 effects, drumsynths... that is 45% max...)

So what else do you use besides the stock VST5 stuff? Coz you should be able to run tons of that stuff on a 2.4 Mhz P4 unless I have overlooked something ...



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 12/24             03-May-07  @  09:04 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Not much really. I usually record evrything to a stereo pair, wich is fine. But whenever i try to do some more elaborate stuff(many tracks with effects and dynamics , eq), the cpu meter ventures in the red. Maybe I have overlooked something, i guess i'll have to recheck all my settings



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 13/24             04-May-07  @  12:46 AM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



yeah fuck if i added a list i can run i logic on our old amd2000xp yoiud shit yourself.. In logic on pc it totaly responds to the 'background services' switch so you can then run it in the meter redline without error messages.. dunno if other sequencers respond to that

anyways summts up mebbe with it? - if you push the cpu meter to red, does anything crap out pc wise? does your pc crap out before it reaches red?, or does it crap out when it reaches red but gets there too easily? er... yes


as for the ssl plugs, talking about uad etc, hardware-wise you could get duende, i spose you could arge that alot of hip hop is 'ssl concious', it's also a number one mix console of hit records, big in metal ... anyways it's popular.. then add to it oddities and some character plugs if required just as you migth have a 4000 and some additional UA comps & neve, helios or whatever channel eq's, but as add-on character pieces rather than the meat and potatoes of the main mix.. stuff for extra taste and character basicaly and the thing those classic units happen to do well...

i tell you tho, for natives i love these s/w ones!   and i dont like waves plugins and never use em except ren comp sometimes, somehow i like the sound of these i guess is all one can say there's something gritty but yet smooth in the harder midrange area i like..

it's subjective anyways, but i spose if duende can deliver 32 channels of ssl you'd be bonkers in a commercial scenario setup not to get it or s/w versions simply for biz - for creativity there's a zillion great free & cheap native comp and eq plugs and then there's your dsp cards - but they cant do a mix in full i think is the issue, in fact i saw on some forum (was it sos?) a guy complaining he'd bought a uad and could only run 2 compressors or something, but he was running it at 192 it turned out, heh, but even still you arent gonna get 32 api, helios or whatever they do wizzo models at once or whatever

anyone heard any opinions on liquidmix expressed anywhere btw?

btw 2 anyone here used sony digital before? .. i was messing with a DMXR100 the oxford cutdown last week, it's loverly but i think it was wired up weird cos could we route it to the multitrack?.. kurwa!! dunno what it was; the 3 tdif out cards were assigned 1-24 to the 3 MTR busses and we had channels routed to those, but only one blasted channel would route which was bizzare, we thought it was mebbe routed into protools and booted that but again could only get channel 2 to take a signal .. however you could send L/R to all 8 busses no probs if you flipped that in l/r to mtr.. it was weird... 4 blooody hours we checked stuff.. gave up, no technicians available to say how it was wired. one would assume tho with 3 tascam 8 tracks sync'd and 3 x tdif cards on the mixer the default would be to route the MTR bus's to the multitracks.. the sony MTR slots were all set to tdif 1-24 as i said, it was mental

*sigh* mice desk tho, touchscreen and you can wire it to a pc for vga output, very nice, one central channel hardware controller and master hardware controller area with pots and buttonsand you simply select channel by a big green button to work on that channel, matrix routing screens etc, nice.... AKG 414's sounded superb thru it, it, nice amps, it was BW monitoring and the bottom end & detail on a percussion (djembe) was gorgeous.

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 14/24             04-May-07  @  07:33 AM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



quote
anyone heard any opinions on liquidmix expressed anywhere btw?


Now that's interesting, because I have heard people raving about it, but most of those were folks who did not have the unit... but of course that could be because of the lack of PC drivers...

I would be really interested how close it gets to the original EQ's... and what's the latency like with the PC driver. Impulse Response technology in itself has its limitations too...

BTW, as far as I know the duende runs more or less the same DSP code as SSL's digital desks... while the waves stuff were modelled after the analog console.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 15/24             04-May-07  @  11:50 AM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  [image]



[image file]


Here's some test with the Waves SSL plugin...

Source material were sine waves at 14946, 15862, 17761, 19927 and 21188 Hz.

You can see aliasing at around 13220 and 20587 Hz (it is very slight, around -80...-90 dB ).

When you turn on the "ANALOG" switch it starts adding noise (over 10 kHz), and also you can overdrive the EQ, so it will generate additional harmonics like an analog amplifier.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 16/24             04-May-07  @  12:07 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



with the beta v2 liquidmix driver I'm getting about 520 samples latency, and like with duende, the most irritating thing is you cant turn the emulations all off at once for tracking, you gotta go and do it one by one a main all-bypass would be a godsend

and that of course is the other issue, there's latency on record so you cant really use it in a return path as you record like you would real SSL hardware or any of the other emualtions liquidmix does or other h/w solutions and ok, you can use this stuff to mix, but it'd kinda nice to use for 'monitor returns' in a s/w sense too if you wanted

for me the orher is reliability, i never boot a song file using s/w plugins and think "Will it boot ok, will it initialise ok, will it crash the host etc" but i've had plenty of crashes from liquidmix, it's that pc-hardware thing again. I updated the pc, re-installed the older firewire sp1 drivers etc to hotfix it back to faster firewire speed, have the latest beta liquidmix s/w.. but it is 'touchy' and the overall comms between s/w and unit isnt so good, sloppy driver writing etc like at the end of the install it tell you to disconnect liquidmix in a text display popup, but as soon as you do that and press NEXT it says:

"Finished installation, error, no liquidmix hardware found"

lol, i mean that just shows sloppy attention to detail in the driver installation authoring to my mind cos there's other anomalies like that. sometimes liquidmix is booted with a host song for the first time and displays a failed to initialise properly notice... ok this was on 2 amd machines, one an old 2000xp and one a new sempron, but i dont think thats any excuse cos they can run plugins no problems in s/w form, but it's that old hardware-problems thing which makes hardware solutions sometimes risky

and finaly there's the whole hassle of having to group NON-liquidmix inserted stuff and delay those groups with sample delay etc - it's a hassle... sounds nice when it works tho, but all that hassle and too much latency to track thu

to my mind the future is native cos gobs more cpu power will come and already it's way plenty, but dsp can do more & faster... how to solve this eh, lol

btw, i quite liked those Sonitus plugs in cakewalk 6 producer, nice

yes duende is their dig desk not a model

after my expreince with the sony dmxR100 i think that with 3 adat cards would be nice and it might not be so expensive, i saw one s/h with 3 fitted adat cards for $8k USD

that desk also has a s/w update which makes it a mackie controller i think so you get 48 channels of controller too i spose, and great eq and amps + 5:1 built in and all the sync you need

they are pretty nice boards, i think they are 17,000 new

interestingly i've heard absolutely jack about the big mackie mixer (that one with touchscreens and i/o card-fit options).. did it flop?

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 17/24             04-May-07  @  01:02 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



"to my mind the future is native cos gobs more cpu power will come and already it's way plenty, but dsp can do more & faster... how to solve this eh, lol"

With new hosts supporting 2, 4 etc.. cores it is no question. Yep, DSP can process more with less calculations, but development costs for the all-around processor will always be cheaper than for the specialised DPSs. At the end I think you will get more computing power for less money if you go native, and the reliability is much better, because you have one interface (host vs. plug) compared to the DPS solution (host vs. plug + plug vs. hardware, not to mention that the later must go through some kind of driver... a driver that might not be available for certain kind of OS versions, etc...)

Damn, even my external keyboard uses a modified USB driver that must be installed over the original XP one... from that point on I wouldn't dare to call this an "USB keyboard" as its driver probably doesn't comply with the standards, it just uses the same HW.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 18/24             04-May-07  @  05:56 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



nice maps rags - we must have posted at same time - what does it look like if you pass a square wave thru it? and the meter level on your picture of the channel strip shows it's way over dbfs redline btw!!

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 19/24             04-May-07  @  08:03 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  [image]



[image file]


Hmmm, the square looks like this (onlythe upper frequency range is shown, as before)...
Also, I have boosted some highs, but not as much as before.

Thing is, the FFT shown nothing special until the EQ is cranked up, so that the meter is all red...
then the noise appears, and some additional lines, that look like added harmonics...

Now the important thing to note that the plug does not clip when the meter goes into the red (that would look awful on the spectragram) it just introduces some noise.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 20/24             04-May-07  @  08:45 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



oh it's just thaty waves specifies that they have set 0bdfs at -18db on the meter, so surely youre red-lining it into clipping arent you?

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 21/24             05-May-07  @  08:04 AM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



I think... (!!!) this depends on the host as well. As far as I know the clip indicator in most plugins indicate the possibility of the clipping, that could happen in a 24 bit (??) environment.

In ableton I have a 32 bit floating point audio path (just like in SX) and that can handle these excess levels... I guess in the RTAS version of the plug the clipping led makes sense, and also in logic.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 22/24             09-May-07  @  01:23 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

nutoniom

Posts: 1345

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Well, after fucking around my settings and back again, i've managed to change something, because it now works very nice. I just can't remember what it is that i've changed

so, no processing pci card for me. I think i'll go for another delta and get myself some more inputs.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 23/24             09-May-07  @  01:56 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

rags .aka. welder

Posts: 649

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



ASIO Buffer size maybe? Too small buffer can increase load on the CPU, although it shouldn't be that significant ...



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 24/24             09-May-07  @  07:08 PM   -   RE: Those UAD-1 cards

k

Posts: 12353

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



y'know, when you add it all up and then look at protools ICON budle deals it starts to look quite good value if you consider the commercial advantages in being able to ffer PT HD.. sure, even if you have the premises all nice and fixed up you still gotta add a decent mic's locker, 5:1 monitoring system and any extras like 40" plasma or LCD screen for video, a new g5 and screens etc, and even then prolly a few choice bits of outboard and eq for add ons would be required, but an HD3 system with 3 x hd 192 racks and command24 with the extra 16 fader banks and all the freebies thrown in is 30k (ex VAT), which seems like alot, but in a commercial setting over a long term lease or loan plan doesnt seem so bad, and i spose you dont have to have 3 X HD192 racks either really, but at least with 192 capability it'll stay relevent for a few years, i cant see clients wanting to record even at 96k tbh.

choices eh... i was looking at AWS900 today, 50k a pop!, nice! works as a controller tho too, lol

___________________________________

I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Viewing all 24 messages  -  View by pages of 10:  1 2 3

There are 24 total messages for this topic





Reply to Thread

You need to register/login to use the forum.

Click here  to Signup or Login !

[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]



Back to Forum





Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)