aaa Has digital audio won the battle?? - Synths & synthesis forums
skin: 1 2 3 4 |  Login | Join Dancetech |

dancetech forums

16-May-2024

Info-line:   [synths]    [sampler]    [drumbox]    [effects]    [mixers]     [mics]     [monitors]    [pc-h/ware]    [pc-s/ware]    [plugins]    -    [links]    [tips]

Search forums House rules Live chat Login to access your admin About dancetech forums Forum home Start a new topic

Forums   -   Synths & synthesis

Subject: Has digital audio won the battle??


Pages: 1 2 3 4


Original Message 1/34             07-Oct-01  @  07:23 PM   -   Has digital audio won the battle??

tweaker_at_work

Posts: 31

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



I really used to love those analog equipment. I
used to work with Juno's Prophet and some Roland
x0x drumcomputers. But lately i have becomming
more and more impressed by the huge possibilities
of digital audio. Do the possibilities digital
audio give outweight the authentic sound of analog
equipment???

PS:
I still love that analog sound but Digital has
also got it's charms but the trick is not to
compare those two but make something different out
of it.

I am interested in youre opinion on



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 2/34             07-Oct-01  @  10:01 PM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

Maarten

Posts: 2082

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Digital does not describe a certain feel to sounds as it used to I guess. Any die hard pro-'analogist' would have to agree, at least partially. I have my VirusB now for a couple weeks and already sometimes can't tell the difference between it and my (sold) SH-101, S.A. Neptune and (at times) me TB303. Still I sometimes regret having sold the SH, don't know why though but if it keeps eating at me much longer I'll search for it again. This on it's own brings questions to this topic for me, there probably is some difference when sound is created by pure electricity instead of a bunch of 1's and 0's.

-M-



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 3/34             08-Oct-01  @  03:07 PM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

Pongoid

Posts: 2003

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



No matter how hard I try, nothing matches the punch, clarity, and thickness of my analog stuff. I use both, and they both sound great in their own way, but especially for live sets, the diffrence is clear, analog is still the shit.

Ape



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 4/34             11-Oct-01  @  07:36 PM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

Matt Hutch

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Yo Ape,

How would you compare the sound of your analog gear running through an analog mixer through the amp to speakers vs. recorded tracks, created on your analog gear, coming out of your computer audio card through the amp to speakers?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 5/34             13-Oct-01  @  11:57 AM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

Pongoid

Posts: 2003

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



bigger, louder, and more raw. Each piece of each sound is clearer. Individual waveforms are much more distinct and defined, and the harmonic content just seems richer.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 6/34             14-Oct-01  @  06:20 AM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

panama

Posts: 348

Link?: Link

File?:  [image]



[image file]


analog is the way man... took me 2 1/2 years
to figure it out (actually, just a few days ago).
Digital has some good things about it
though... intresting modulated sounds and
good square waves here and there. BUT,
analog is KING no matter what.

Analog has this essence about it - especially
VCO synths... little shifting in tones, gives the
ear the goodies it needs... you can hear this
live definitley - it gives you more than you
need, like cutting the mix and making it
'phatter' with ease.

Run a recorded bassline off a virus and put it
through a filter factory... then listen to the
changes as the filter sweeps... now get a
sh-101 and filter it with a Filterfactory, or a Big
Briar Low-pass and hear the difference in the
sweep... something is there



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 7/34             14-Oct-01  @  04:57 PM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

Pongoid

Posts: 2003

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



try samples of an 808 versus a real one live. Just not the same beast.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 8/34             15-Oct-01  @  06:39 AM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

bedwyr

Posts: 2890

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



is it the inherent 'randomness' of analog that peoples ears like? digital is the exact same sound every time (slightly simplistic..), if you put a bit of random-ing into a digital patch maybe your ears don't get bored so quickly?

panama, sh-101 and virus are different synths, so there will be a difference no? question is which one do u like...

ps why is analog 'authentic'?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 9/34             15-Oct-01  @  09:45 AM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

Bastiaan (Hajee)

Posts: 1309

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



By definition Analogue is authentic (the original) since digital VA's try to copy/recreate them. I think it takes more than randomization to get that full sounds and recording an analogue on your PC than playing it back (digitally) STILL is not the same as the sound of a softsynth or VA...let me give you an example to clarify: when I record some Bach played by a real symphonic orchestra and play it back digitally tru my computer I possibly loose some high freqs and some dynamic content but it still sounds a HELL of a lot better dan any sampler or digital synth can do...same goes with analogue versus digital synths...albeit with possible lesser difference.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 10/34             16-Oct-01  @  04:41 AM     Edit: 16-Oct-01  |  04:44 AM   -   RE: Has digital audio won the battle??

panama

Posts: 348

Link?: Link

File?:  [image]



[image file]


bedwyr: you kind of got the idea but didnt... as
Pongoid stated, analog on a live PA sounds
much better than a digital setup. This applys
seemingly with analog synth and drum gear.
Yes, you could prolly do slight changes in tone
with digital gear... but it's not the same thing
as with vintage analog. Voltage Controlled
Osc's warm up and get sexy... while VA's just
turn on and are ready to go. These VCO's have
real circuits and real parts making sound
exist... VA's are just code and computer
software with processors.

for me, I'd rather start with real product, then
take it further... because along the way -
secrets rely in what you 'really' don't hear.

Analog has it... digital does not!

but hey! you can write music on a digital and
rock the party ten times harder... but for me,
analog is true music to my ears.

sh-101 vs. Virus basslines? eh? just an
example of why analog has earthly character
compared to a VA.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Pages: 1 2 3 4

There are 34 total messages for this topic





Reply to Thread

You need to register/login to use the forum.

Click here  to Signup or Login !

[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]



Back to Forum





Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)