Forums - Synths & synthesis
Subject: Roland - emulate or innovate?
Original Message Date: 03-May-02 @ 11:49 PM - Roland - emulate or innovate?
is Roland still the innovater?
Message 21/73 13-May-02 @ 07:24 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
BTW, 'bout the filters... please stress 'MC' when saying 303.
Thank you.
Message 22/73 13-May-02 @ 09:29 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
I have close friends who ARE japanese and have actually told me the same thing that brett wrote. now, whether or not he is correct is another story (what's the TB 303 and copy of?), but his statement was hardly hateful or anything.
my wife's Korean friends named their dog "roland" in honor of the legendary beatboxes...my wife usually calls him "loland". big trouble with l's and r's. and that's funny, dammit. no harm done.
lighten up. there are plenty of other ways to gang up on brett ;)
Message 23/73 14-May-02 @ 08:49 AM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
I guess as D said it Roland sorta stopped being innovative back in the juno/jupiter/TR days?
was there some hypercreative design group behind that stuff?
Damn..time for a history lesson. Wheres the old men? Damballah? Pongoid (wait..hes younger than me) MINDSPAWN?!?!?!
xoxos?
Message 24/73 14-May-02 @ 03:02 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
Hey RT. Shut the up. It really pisses me off when people do what you do. If you feel you have differing information - present it without the insults. Why is it so difficult for people to have a discussion and share information without getting their panties in a knot?
Message 25/73 14-May-02 @ 03:06 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
But bear in mind that the Pacific Rim countries that are exploding into the American auto and consumer electronis market are heavily supported by their governments. To my knowledge, the Japanese government doesn't do it as much as they used to, but the Koreans are building products with little regard for profitability. Whether that is right or wrong is a different discussion.
I think Roland has done a little bit of both. And I think the groove-machines are TOTALLY innovative. Developing a user friendly front-end has created a musical revolution, no doubt about it. And even if they weren't the first ones to do it - they brought it to the mass-market. That is certainly something.
Message 26/73 14-May-02 @ 09:07 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
what's wrong with government subsities? not "fair"? i don't really see the difference between the two approaches; it's just a question of how the businesses receive the money. DIRECTLY from the gov (given to the business via subsity) or INDIRECTLY from the gov (not taken from the gov via low taxes).
Message 27/73 14-May-02 @ 09:11 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
i just don't see where right and wrong enter into it... so now it's wrong to NOT be motivated be profits? why? cause it doesn't fit into YOUR (country's) "philosophy"? why not just ban all trade with other countries?
Message 28/73 14-May-02 @ 09:15 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
Message 29/73 14-May-02 @ 09:19 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
Message 30/73 14-May-02 @ 11:17 PM - RE: Roland - emulate or innovate?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
There are 73 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum