Forums - Music tracks & feedback
Subject: A new "vote yourself to the top"
Viewing all 88 messages - View by pages of 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 9
Original Message 1/88 26-Feb-02 @ 08:37 PM - A new
NINTENDO? WHAT THE FUCK?
my man...you might be taking yourself just a LITTLE too seriously
better start voting EVERY DAY so you can see your name at the top of the shit hot DT chart!
Message 3/88 26-Feb-02 @ 09:18 PM - RE: A new
Message 5/88 26-Feb-02 @ 10:04 PM - RE: A new
and FUCK hyenas for their lame bullshit, and their pussy refusal to respond to my email challenges.
Message 6/88 26-Feb-02 @ 11:55 PM - RE: A new
I`m superstyling.
Message 8/88 27-Feb-02 @ 12:34 AM - RE: A new
Message 9/88 27-Feb-02 @ 12:43 AM - RE: A new
Message 10/88 27-Feb-02 @ 12:50 AM - RE: A new
Message 11/88 27-Feb-02 @ 12:53 AM - RE: A new
Message 13/88 27-Feb-02 @ 02:01 AM - RE: A new
Message 14/88 27-Feb-02 @ 02:27 AM - RE: A new
Message 15/88 27-Feb-02 @ 02:41 AM - RE: A new
Message 17/88 27-Feb-02 @ 04:43 PM - RE: A new
Message 18/88 27-Feb-02 @ 06:32 PM - RE: A new
BUT HEY WHO DOSEN'T?
WELL AT LEAST DJ MEGAHEAD ASKED PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR HIM AND DJ MEGAHEAD WOULD LIKE TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND WHO HAS VOTED SO FAR IN FAVOUR OF TRANCE MUSIC PRODUCTION
HOWEVER,DJ MEGAHEAD NEEDS MORE VOTES AND INSTEAD OF POSTING MORE SILLY PICTURES I AM CALLING ON MY FANS TO SUPPORT ME JUST THAT LITTLE BIT MORE, GO THE EXTRA KILOMETER SO TO SPEAK
ONLY WHEN DJ MEGAHEAD REACHES NUMBER ONE WILL HIS EGO BE COMPLETE
SORRY ENGLISH MY BAD
MAY THE TRANCE MUSIC BE WITH YOU
Message 19/88 27-Feb-02 @ 06:50 PM - RE: A new
i´m having it for my next track :P
Message 20/88 27-Feb-02 @ 08:44 PM - RE: A new
and steve, where's that mullet sporting lawyer of yours? those three notes are still mine you looney lutonite.
Brett, is that true ? I guess i'll have to listen to see what you mean. Do you have the MPG80 for that baby ? Does it have cross modulation ? I'll listen tonight, it just seems odd. I'm not trying to patronise you or anything.
Message 21/88 28-Feb-02 @ 01:43 AM - RE: A new
Sunshine in the Rain. This is a nice track too. Nice feel to it. You definately have some excellent production going on your tracks. I likey. I don't know about where it almost comes to a sonic halt at about 3:00, but hey. Excellent track though.
Message 22/88 28-Feb-02 @ 02:32 PM - RE: A new
and disregard my comment alltogether, i'm just an ageing punk
Message 23/88 28-Feb-02 @ 06:22 PM - RE: A new
Message 24/88 28-Feb-02 @ 09:32 PM - RE: A new
Message 25/88 28-Feb-02 @ 11:53 PM - RE: A new
[image file]
I am here.
My client has instructed me to inform you that you now have 30 days to completely cease use of the hallowed 3 note melody (U.S. patent pending). Failure to adhere to these instructions will leave us with no other option than to commence court proceedings.
Good day to you.
Message 26/88 01-Mar-02 @ 04:06 AM - RE: A new
And please, influx, don't be silly man, I didn't bothered you at all, in fact I did vote for you some times, so why are you doing this??
I'm not hyenas, I'm not Megahead so leave me alone man! I'm just doing music, dedicated to it, no more, no less.
BTW: The track is just finished, is called "Chaotic perfection", and is here if you want to hear it:
http://www.shockinsider.com/spyro/cp.htm
Message 27/88 01-Mar-02 @ 04:57 AM - RE: A new
as for the juno, don't touch since i got reason. No "Reason" to....
Reason has a great limiter on it written into the software, so everything comes out sounding so smooth and tight and loud, and everything is so in tune.
I honestly couldn't get this quality out of my older gear.
If i go live, I will use a Virus down the road to dial up similar sounds. And since the midi is all there in Reason, I just export it over to what ever sequencer I need to use.
Message 28/88 01-Mar-02 @ 05:55 AM - RE: A new
nb: don't mind the 3 nipples tho'
Does the sysex clog the midi data ? (just curious as i have no intentions to rack my brain with it anytime soon, but was under impression cc's were more efficient traffic wise)
I think i'll be able to muscle my way up for "Best overall shit talker"
Message 29/88 01-Mar-02 @ 06:08 AM - RE: A new
I just thought that whole thing was sort of like OTHER voting systems, where OBSERVERS or LISTENERS vote
imagine if politicians could vote for themselves as much as they want. STILL pointless cuz it doesnt prove anything!
you are right, though, it is QUITE silly of me to even notice, but it just bugs me
but wait..what is the difference between you and hyenas? you guys do the same thing, right? they just have more tracks that they think are hot shit
Message 30/88 01-Mar-02 @ 06:16 AM - RE: A new
who is you?
I'm confused, fat churro time
Message 31/88 01-Mar-02 @ 09:16 AM - RE: A new
Message 32/88 02-Mar-02 @ 03:52 AM Edit: 02-Mar-02 | 06:49 AM - RE: A new
I recall, do you posted a message about you beeing on the top, inflated enough I must say, and someone replied you with something like he wanted to see you when you fall down off the charts.
Yes! you were on the top of the charts, your track "Smoke and mirrors" is well made although is not my cup of tea.
I can recall many good tracks, including the Xoxo's "Virtual paradize" and they aren't on the chart right now.
The charts doesn't mean anything as kilo said at the beginning of the competition.
I voted for myself, as I said, is the least I can do to support my own work, and I'm sure many others did the same, including you, but I was the only one to admit it.
Let the jugdes pick the winner, I think my track is good enough to win, I think many tracks are good enough to win, including yours.
Message 33/88 02-Mar-02 @ 05:46 AM - RE: A new
Message 35/88 02-Mar-02 @ 10:18 AM - RE: A new
I am angry about many things, but not being at the top of the dancetech chart isnt one of them (actually, youre no longer there either!)
awww this is pointless. just keep doing all the things you can if they make you feel bigger, man. more power to you.
Message 36/88 02-Mar-02 @ 10:22 AM - RE: A new
bich.
Message 38/88 02-Mar-02 @ 02:58 PM - RE: A new
"¡no polito!" he he
Message 39/88 02-Mar-02 @ 06:40 PM - RE: A new
Yep! i'm not there
>awww this is pointless.
Yep!
Peace.
Message 40/88 02-Mar-02 @ 06:51 PM - RE: A new
Message 41/88 02-Mar-02 @ 09:04 PM - RE: A new
it was the BLURB man..that is one of the FREAKIEST peaces of written material I have ever seen!
thanks for reminding me damballah
Message 42/88 03-Mar-02 @ 01:57 PM - RE: A new
Anyone wanna buy a KORG i3, a Mixer, a NUMARK Double CD Player and some other stuff to help a brotha out with his crack habits
Check it yo
and out
Message 43/88 03-Mar-02 @ 09:29 PM - RE: A new
Don't remind me that please! That day was a fuckin nighmare to me and my family, we were all tied up, from my lil brother to my grandmother.
I can see my Korg i3 taking dirt on a dark room, sob!
Message 45/88 04-Mar-02 @ 03:53 AM - RE: A new
As for the sysex being slow or tricky, it's not. You just type in the 9 digits of hex into the slider on the bank of my o1v, and the value hex is set to fad so the fader position determines the value. Sonar and cubase record it flawlessly. But you can't edit it graphicly like cc's. One way around this is to use waveidea's midi-remapper and have those same sysex messages converted to a cc on input and output so you could edit them. Another would be to have a graphic editor for sysex synths in mind and implimented into the application but i have yet to see this. You can do so much with sysex that the cc's don't support, like making parameter changes to the fx etc. that are not designed for realtime, like reverb decay. . So you can assign that to a controler like the kenton control freak or my o1v and now have realtime control of non realtime parameters.
Message 46/88 04-Mar-02 @ 04:07 AM - RE: A new
Message 47/88 04-Mar-02 @ 08:21 AM - RE: A new
You're a lemming Brett, and i don't care about you. You've got it all figured all out, haven't you?
"The money can be made if you really want some more"
That's really all what i'll to say ! coming from a lemming, mind you!
OI! OI ! OI !
Message 49/88 04-Mar-02 @ 09:27 AM - RE: A new
MINE MINE MINE
Message 50/88 04-Mar-02 @ 09:44 AM - RE: A new
i don't understand. what does this mean?
Message 51/88 04-Mar-02 @ 10:27 AM - RE: A new
Message 52/88 04-Mar-02 @ 11:07 AM - RE: A new
Message 53/88 04-Mar-02 @ 12:09 PM - RE: A new
anyway the point was that some DT users are flat out dicks, and always look for an oppurtunity to be assholes. The point I made is valid as far i am concerned. Don't get worked up about the chart....blah blah blah, and that some of the music here is wierd , meaning experimental for fun, and not to be taken seriously. and i am not puting in 16 hour days in front of computer making tracks to entertain a few peple on a one web site. I make music that i love, and i know many else will as well. Comercail vailue needed to move forward had nothing to with artistic growth, simply a professional reality. If your music doesn't sell, then you will not have the same opurtunity do other things and projects that can come from comercial success. Film sound track, TV, and other production. Not even large scale success. i mean you can have an albumn flop, but the right people liked it artisticly and open a door for you.
I get qet a kick out the die hard club head making music to just for the sake of it. If that suits you, fine. It doesn't me.
Message 54/88 04-Mar-02 @ 04:27 PM - RE: A new
I'm known for spouting shit when I'm drunk. Mind you, I do it under my name, so I'm allowed
I do it less often too, so consider yourself special.
I kind of apologize for the aggro post, but the core still stands. You make me itch.
Influx, steve's lawyer is on his way, you can kick him in the head too.
Of course Lemmings is yours, i'll give you half a point for it.
Message 55/88 04-Mar-02 @ 05:27 PM - RE: A new
Message 56/88 04-Mar-02 @ 08:23 PM - RE: A new
pull your head out, man. your mixes are sounding a bit brash
Message 58/88 04-Mar-02 @ 11:09 PM - RE: A new
Message 59/88 04-Mar-02 @ 11:15 PM - RE: A new
Message 61/88 05-Mar-02 @ 12:42 AM - RE: A new
come on, now! commercial success is certainly an indicator of validity, no?
Message 63/88 05-Mar-02 @ 02:16 AM - RE: A new
I am shooting to get to the level and beauty of what the Hartnoll brothers do. Sometimes people have heard that desire in my tracks and I am very encouraged and flattered by it. I know I have a long way to go in that, but if you're going to start a talent pissing match with me, your in way over your head amigo. I'm totally confident and tested by peers in my own musicianship, but it doesn't make me happy to see you getting down on anyone else. And it really doesn't become you. Enjoy all the styles you hear at dt. I do. I learn from everybody here and appreciate some amazing tracks I hear at dt, including yours.
Message 64/88 05-Mar-02 @ 02:45 AM - RE: A new
Brett..you can do what you like, of course, and you can write all the music you want with the basic intention of selling it, but I for one (and many others Im sure, here at DT and elsewhere) are 100& convinced that the minute you let that be your motivation (commercially "viable") the heart just falls out never to be found again
SURE you might sell some singles, or an album, or whatever, but there are plenty of us here who really couldn't care less about that aspect if it involves artistic compromise. I can say for sure that everyone would LOVE to make money doing something that comes from the heart, but i can also say that the ones that get into this sort of thing with the intention of "getting big" are the ones that stand out like a pustulating infected wound (and should subsequently be cut out and tossed away)
so there you have it. Commercialism SUCKS, plain and simple. Idont know where you truly stand but you come in here calling people "cocks" again and you probably won't be standing much longer
try some humility on for size as well, son.
sitar...that is ONE FUCKING LONG RESUME!!!!! now quit the LOOK AT ME shit;)
Message 65/88 05-Mar-02 @ 02:53 AM - RE: A new
Nope. I was surprised to hear Brett say that type of thing. Had to let him know how clueless one can be judging the talents of others who are sincerely aspiring and learning....like me :P
Message 66/88 05-Mar-02 @ 03:43 AM - RE: A new
Message 67/88 05-Mar-02 @ 03:59 AM - RE: A new
"It's funny you mention Orbital. The fact that you would equate the talent you or the likes of the rest of you cocks who needless don't respect others opinions, to being anything close to Orbital in style or skill. What a joke."
OK, first..the cocks thing. Brett...I have this image of you in my mind, and if it is accurate you are just another geek who hasnt really done much living, and youre clearly angry about it. But calling 'us' cocks (Im sure you had yours truly in mind when you wrote that) is, well, pussy. hehe. cocks and pussy. If you werent so full of yourself (as you so obviously ARE it wouldnt be so annoying to read what you write, because you seem to have a pretty good handle on REASON )
You can sit in your bedroom studio making tracks for other people siting in there bedroom studios.
Hey..if someone enjoys doing that, good for them!
Or you can make some decent music that will get played for a real audience who is willing to pay.
on my way, baby. Puttin out a 12" this month. Might even SELL some records! But..it doesnt sound like hybrid so it's probably not good enough.
Have it your way, and keep complaining about who does or doesn't belong on the charts......because it's realy realy realy important!!!!!
No one was complaining about who 'belongs' there. I, for one, am just sick of all these fuckers modelling the commercial world, where its all about self-promotion and that sort of nonsense, and PRETENDING to be all fucking artistic about it. Smug, self important ninnys who write a page long synopsis of a fucking instrumental track.
"really , ...lemming....., That's rich! hahah"
yes. lemming. because youre constantly pushing whats "hot" out there...as if youre some groundbreaker when in reality perhaps youre more of a salesman, like the types at guitar center and sam ash who jump on the newest "tool"(toy) and claim that its the best thing since sliced bread.
and on top of all that, sitar could write you into a corner, my friend.
watch the lame name calling and you won't get shit from folks.
commercial. the word itself makes me want to retch
Message 68/88 05-Mar-02 @ 05:17 AM - RE: A new
Let the amatuers be amatuers about how they promote themselves, and quit dising people because they are not as logical about arranging there songs etc. You tore one guy a new one for having a 9 minute track. Hell Orbital has a bunch of them and if that's what you are trying do then , you better get started learning how to make 9 minutes oof music that keeps you interested and surprised. There are ways to deliver constructive critisism without the humilation and abusive tone you take. People are sensative about what they create and if sucks don't just say it sucks. Give your expertise in a way a mentor would. Also quit quantifying everyone here with stereo typical definitions. You are not the Law of the land, and it's time you started showing others some respect.
As for pushing expensive gear.. What where and when? If someone says hey what can do this, i simply state what may or may not work, wether from what I read or what ever. Food for thought. as for the guys at GC etc. I condemn the way they sell a newbie stuff they don't need. It happend to me when i first started. If you see all my threads i promote cheap solutions as well. Namely standing behind Reason.
Message 69/88 05-Mar-02 @ 05:25 AM - RE: A new
[image file]
Q: who's album are those quotes scanned from?
Message 70/88 05-Mar-02 @ 05:34 AM - RE: A new
eh?
I have yet to tell someone a track sucks. not ONCE have I said that to anyone. Sure...I give people shit all the time, for being typical followers adhering to standard modes of promotion, presentation, etc.
again, not like I'm such a groundbreaker
oh..and btw...so you were calline ME a "cock".
Message 71/88 05-Mar-02 @ 10:00 AM - RE: A new
so brett, who's music on here are you not taking seriously then?
d, pistols.
Message 72/88 05-Mar-02 @ 01:57 PM - RE: A new
Message 73/88 05-Mar-02 @ 03:28 PM - RE: A new
I feel strangely aroused.
but really, I just saw that knob with a face like a monkeys arse off pop idol just sold 1.1 million copies of his debut single, and its not even a particulary well-crafted piece of pop. Its fcuking horrible in fact, and thats the fastest selling single in uk pop history.
How embarassing, thats like 1 in 60 people went out and bought that (with more to come no doubt) after shamelessly having the whole thing shoved down their throats for months on primetime tv
I guess people in general are stupid, and have not taste.
Gotta love a bit of elitism.
Message 74/88 05-Mar-02 @ 05:25 PM - RE: A new
Message 76/88 05-Mar-02 @ 07:22 PM - RE: A new
Message 77/88 05-Mar-02 @ 07:45 PM - RE: A new
:P
Brett's been a cool guy to see around here. I was just surprised by the disregard for other musicians. I guess things go to our heads sometimes. It's happened to me plenty. Wish we could all hug and be over it.
Message 78/88 05-Mar-02 @ 10:01 PM - RE: A new
Message 79/88 25-Mar-02 @ 02:49 AM - RE: A new
I've been quite happy to see mostly artistic, idealistic musicians here who aren't driven by mostly commercial influences. Brett is the first that I have seen here that, in SEVERAL threads over the last few weeks, keeps saying things in relation to "commercial potential" or some such nonsense.
When I first started coming here several years ago, I was _immensely_ influenced by the voices here. . .Lucky for me, those voices were people like Caspar Project, sitar, xoxos, influx, pongoid, etc... Artists who's music people respect because of the voice and sincerity with which it is delivered (and they can all spell a hell of lot better than he can, which, as small as that is, actually makes one's thoughts alot more respectable).
Not that I would ever buy into his crap, but some may, especially when he posts so damn much. So yeah, there may be some "cocks" here, but it's because most of us have no respect for the way in which you treat your music. . . How could we? You don't seem to respect your OWN music. . . It's a prostitute for you.
Message 80/88 25-Mar-02 @ 03:11 AM - RE: A new
sometimes its fun to see where old arguments go
Message 81/88 25-Mar-02 @ 10:20 AM - RE: A new
We'll be up-dating the chart-vote code soon & put a 7-day buffer on it, cos this Hyena's thing is going a BIT too far regardless of whether their tracks are good or not - or/and we could make a simple 'click to view voting analysis' button so people could see which tracks were 'self-voters'.
Message 82/88 25-Mar-02 @ 11:04 AM - RE: A new
Message 84/88 25-Mar-02 @ 04:15 PM - RE: A new
Message 85/88 25-Mar-02 @ 07:19 PM - RE: A new
you typed PULIC, not PUBIC
so to both of you, its PUBLIC
and..hyenas are WACK doin what they do, and I say no voting for yourself past the one time. its just fecking stupid
Message 87/88 25-Mar-02 @ 07:40 PM - RE: A new
Viewing all 88 messages - View by pages of 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 9
There are 88 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum