aaa Micro Q single vs multi editing - Synths & synthesis forums
skin: 1 2 3 4 |  Login | Join Dancetech |

dancetech forums

29-Apr-2024

Info-line:   [synths]    [sampler]    [drumbox]    [effects]    [mixers]     [mics]     [monitors]    [pc-h/ware]    [pc-s/ware]    [plugins]    -    [links]    [tips]

Search forums House rules Live chat Login to access your admin About dancetech forums Forum home Start a new topic

Forums   -   Synths & synthesis

Subject: Micro Q single vs multi editing


Viewing all 10 messages  -  View by pages of 10:  1


Original Message 1/10             19-Oct-02  @  05:01 AM   -   Micro Q single vs multi editing

JX3P0

Posts: 28

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Ok so what gives.i came up w/ a nice fat bass
in single mode.Switch over to multi and all
params appear to be the same yet the sound
isn't.Huh?And yes i've read the manual but it
isn't too clear.So should I just start out in Multi
if I plan on using multis?Dumb question but
hey,I need an answer.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 2/10             19-Oct-02  @  05:03 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

influx

Posts: 7627

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



no help, but...Ive had the same experience with virus...and still never figured out why!



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 3/10             19-Oct-02  @  05:26 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

JX3P0

Posts: 28

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



German Measels is all I can tell.I was all
stoked(yes I used to skate) about the sound
and assigned a nice multi and it morphed.So I
just used the single.Kind of defeated the
purpose in getting an all in one VA.I guess I'll
just edit in Multi mode.Did that fix your quirks?


H



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 4/10             19-Oct-02  @  06:09 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

nothingnewhere

Posts: 646

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



are you sure you werent sending any cc's to it in one mode but not the other? did the fx2 slot change cause you switched to multi? thats all i can think of.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 5/10             19-Oct-02  @  06:45 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

psylichon

Posts: 4573

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



On the nova when you tweak a sound in program mode it only affects the edit buffer. Those changes don't show up in multi mode. That's why I work in multi mode because that's how I'm sequencing anyway.

I love reading posts in forums I don't have anything to do with and giving answers according to my gear and hoping they help. Good luck.

psylichon



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 6/10             19-Oct-02  @  09:09 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

JX3P0

Posts: 28

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



yeah i actually saved the edit to the multi
program and couldn't find it.I think.F*ck i'm not
sure now that i think of it.Well considering that
they all work about the same i'll give it some
research when I have a lil less sleeping to
do.Not that i'm going to sleep but I'd hate to
wake up and go"now how did i fix that"I
definitely idn't send anything but note data.But
I will check the fx in the morning.thanks.chock
another one up to digital.

H



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 7/10             19-Oct-02  @  11:12 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

milan

Posts: 5701

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



is it the fx? because in multimode all your fx are determined by the ones being used on the first four patches, or in the global menu. so if you set your new patch on ch.5 it might loose fx settings you originaly assigned.

oh wait: "i actually saved the edit to the multi program and couldn't find it"- if you edit a sound you have to save the patch for the changes to stay. if you save the multi it will only recall the saved version of the patch.

does this help?



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 8/10             19-Oct-02  @  11:59 AM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

JX3P0

Posts: 28

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



I still have the single saved in all it's
glory.Sounds nice.I followed the manual to set
up a multi and it seemed to tard out.I'll check
the fx though.At some point soon since I
stopped doing drugs months ago I think i'll
pass out.Later when I wake up i'll check it
out.Sounds like a possibility but i generally
make my synths dry.i'm not a big fan of wet
mixes.I'll have to re-examine my method.It's
probably a simple oversight on my part.All I
remember is the manual wasn't so clear on
it.Thanks peeps for the advice and i'll get on it
later today.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 9/10             19-Oct-02  @  02:14 PM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

Stefan

Posts: 472

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Possible reasons:
- The FX2 of your single sound is different from the FX2 of the multi (there is only one global FX2 in a multi, but you can link it to your desired sound with the global link parameter, provided that it is on part 1-4)
- Your single sound uses the FX1 unit, but is now on one of the multi parts 5-16, where FX1 is not available
- Your sound doesn't go to the same output as in single mode
- if your single sound uses a panning modulation in single mode, it looses this effect in multimode if the FX2 send is different from zero (annoying bug btw)
- you've changed one of the multi edit parameters like volume, panning, detune etc.



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Message 10/10             19-Oct-02  @  02:16 PM   -   RE: Micro Q single vs multi editing

milan

Posts: 5701

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



"if your single sound uses a panning modulation in single mode, it looses this effect in multimode if the FX2 send is different from zero"

wow, never heard of that one! vgood reason to ask for OS2.15 then  



[ back to forum ]              [quote]

Viewing all 10 messages  -  View by pages of 10:  1

There are 10 total messages for this topic





Reply to Thread

You need to register/login to use the forum.

Click here  to Signup or Login !

[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]



Back to Forum





Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)