Forums - Mixing & FX
Subject: Why is digital less warm than....
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Original Message Date: 28-Feb-02 @ 09:02 PM - Why is digital less warm than....
We all hear things like, digital isn't as warm as analog, and while I'm not here to argue that specifically, did you ever think about why that is? Outside of some of the basic physical properties, you'd think the two mediums wouldn't be that divergent.... and in some sense, maybe they're not. Now I'm gonna try a little heresy...
Maybe the reason mixes from analog sounds warmer, more musical, whatever, is: our techniques for recording, mixing, etc., are mostly built and modeled on analog experience. We've learned techniques for, say mic placement, that were establised in the analog realm... maybe we should be evaluating new ways of doing things....?
I mean think about one of the most basic differences between the two mediums, the level meter... Many of us that came from the analog world were sorely surprised to find out we couldn't push the LEDs "past the red" on a digital board... Now once I learned how to use digital LEDs, mt life, and my mixes, sounded better...
I'm not really trying to lay out new "rules" of digital recording/mixing, but just bouncing the idea off you all. If you have any experience with what I'm on about here, by all means share it. If you got a "warm sound" from all digital equipment, what was your methodology? Why do you think it worked that way? If you captured a digital take of a vocalist that just simply shimmers, did you do it the "traditional" (i.e., basically as it's always been done on analog equipment) way, or did you find a technique that is exclusive to digital?
Anyhoos, just some thoughts....
Peace All
Message 131/157 09-Apr-02 @ 10:18 PM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
"look at the bass. its so stable"
Message 132/157 10-Apr-02 @ 12:30 AM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
___________________________________
I had an idea for a script once. It's basically Jaws except when the guys in the boat are going after Jaws, they look around and there's an even bigger Jaws. The guys have to team up with Jaws to get Bigger Jaws.... I call it... Big Jaws!!!
Message 133/157 10-Apr-02 @ 12:56 AM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
Message 134/157 10-Apr-02 @ 01:14 AM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
Message 135/157 10-Apr-02 @ 01:53 AM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
i reckon.
Message 136/157 10-Apr-02 @ 03:15 PM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
rt
Message 137/157 10-Apr-02 @ 03:21 PM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
Thanks for your comments!
rt
Message 138/157 10-Apr-02 @ 06:14 PM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
ok so what do analog sound generators--with no 'bits' to speak of--feed to speakers?
or A/D converters as rt mentioned.
this is related to why samples of synths sound different than the synths themselves playing the same parts?
16-bit samples of SP-1200 hits don't sound as cool as the SP itself because they spit too many bits at the speakers?
so this lo-fi magic is happening *right* at the moment that electrical energy is converted into acoustic energy?
how 'bout on a Mac ;)
Message 139/157 10-Apr-02 @ 07:10 PM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
Analogue synths present a smooth, continuous signal to a speaker - but so does a DAC on a digital synth, only the DAC signal is less smooth because of the way it was constructed.
Let me use an analogy - imagine a smooth, well defined surface that represents an analogue signal from an analogue synth. Now instead of the smooth surface, replace it with a closely-packed array of spikes that describe the same surface (think Pinhead in Hellraiser). This array of spikes represents the digitally encoded signal. Now lay a sheet of rubber over the spikes (analogous to the action of a DAC) - you get a smooth surface once again, but its not perfectly smooth since between the spikes there's no information about the original surface. The rubber sheet fills in the gaps, just as a DAC does. The more spikes you have, the closer to the original surface you will get. Same with digital audio, but replace 'spikes' with 'bits'.
This analogy could explain why lower bit depth gives greater perceived volume - imagine having two representations of the original surface in front of you, one with loads of very densely packed spikes under the sheet, giving a smooth contour, and the other with much fewer spikes, resulting in a more choppy, irregular surface. Which one would you look at first? Which grabs your attention? Which is visually 'louder'?
Message 140/157 17-Apr-02 @ 05:29 AM - RE: Why is digital less warm than....
What bit depth DOES give you is extra headroom and dynamic range, which allows things to sound less "compressed" (a non-issue at 24-bits for most purposes). When you get crappy quality out of a DAC, it is usually caused by poor clocking in the stairstep generator (which adds nasty harmonics that can get through the filter) or a poor quality filter design for the Nyquist smoothing filter.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
There are 157 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum