Forums - Live / PA / gigging
Subject: Define "Live"
Original Message Date: 04-Apr-02 @ 04:21 PM - Define
I know there's a lot of differences, including artist vs audience perception. Just wonderin' what y'alls take on this was...
From me own perspective what satisfies my definition of "live" is no pre-recorded songs or backing, no individual sequence in excess of 32 measures in length, and doing something a little more involved than hitting a button or a knob once every ten minutes. That's not to say if you don't meet my "criteria" that you'd get no respect, far from it actually... I'm just giving out my own definition of what makes it LIVE for me, and that ain't necessarily what makes it good by any means....
Peace
Message 52/79 09-May-02 @ 07:05 PM - RE: Define
It's like the wizard of Oz. If the crowd digs it and you're diggin' it it's all good. But if the crowd knew that you had a DAT machine up your sleeve would they still dig it? I doubt it...
So I say, Don't cheat your audience with a tape or a fully sequenced song. Learn to play your trax off the cuff and respond to the mood of the party. I play with a partner now and we write the trax together, then we PLAY them together and it's never the same twice. It's given us some train wrecks but it's also produced magic.
I think that's what live is... magic. Which I know brings me right back to the wizard of Oz...
hmmmmm!
errata
Message 53/79 10-May-02 @ 12:19 AM - RE: Define
Message 54/79 13-May-02 @ 10:33 PM - RE: Define
Message 55/79 14-May-02 @ 10:58 PM - RE: Define
That's what I have to do if I'm gonna do it *live*.. And then I have to throw around sequences in logic looking like a fool while sometimes tweaking Nova's lovely cutoff knob
I'm going to do som research on this live thing.. I really wanna do it.. starting with reading this enormous tread ;)
Cheers!
Message 56/79 15-May-02 @ 07:39 PM - RE: Define
I've been thinking more and more about using a laptop for sequencing and sampling lately though.. It's so easy to assign hardware controllers to things in Sonar that I'm having a hard time ignoring its potential..
-Craig
Message 57/79 15-May-02 @ 08:52 PM - RE: Define
Message 58/79 15-May-02 @ 09:53 PM - RE: Define
Mind you I'm thinking no DXi/VSTi, basic mix, sampled parts rendered to audio, etc.. I mean, if you wanted to really do it on the cheap you could probably get away with a Pentium-II class machine running 98SE with 64MB running Cubasis or Cake 9 or Home Studio or something.. You could probably do a bang-up job with Orion on older hardware too. You're probably going to lose some of the realtime tweakability though. Sonar's good with assigning hardware controllers, so's Orion.
I guess it'd depend on what you wanted to get out of it. Me personally I'd like to be able to get everything set in the studio, then just basically load a bundle onto the lapptop - so I'd want the same basic setup, Sonar on Windows XP, or 2000..
-Craig
Message 59/79 30-May-02 @ 12:16 PM - RE: Define
Also, realize that PC's like to crash at the worst times, esp. in hot clubs. I have had TOO much experience with this to let Craig do it without fair warning. Craig, I dunno if you have had exp. with the live PC thing before, but be careful bro. I know you are using an rm1x to sequence live right now, and that you want to ditch it for the pc setup. I did the EXACT same thing, and wanted to hit myself for a long time after for doing that. Too many fuckups during parties.
Please excuse my rambling, but Live work is more than half the reason I produce techno, and I gotta give out all the advice I can collect from personal experience.
peace,
- Nick
Message 60/79 30-May-02 @ 02:48 PM - RE: Define

Right now I don't trust what I'm doing to a computer live either. Times are changing though...
-Craig
Pages: 1 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
There are 79 total messages for this topic
Reply to Thread
You need to register/login to use the forum.
Click here to Signup or Login !
[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]
Back to Forum